Using RBAC Authorization
Role-based access control (RBAC) is a method of regulating access to computer or network resources based on the roles of individual users within your organization.
RBAC authorization uses the rbac.authorization.k8s.io
API group to drive authorization
decisions, allowing you to dynamically configure policies through the Kubernetes API.
To enable RBAC, start the API server
with the --authorization-mode
flag set to a comma-separated list that includes RBAC
;
for example:
kube-apiserver --authorization-mode=Example,RBAC --other-options --more-options
API objects
The RBAC API declares four kinds of Kubernetes object: Role, ClusterRole,
RoleBinding and ClusterRoleBinding. You can
describe objects,
or amend them, using tools such as kubectl
, just like any other Kubernetes object.
Role and ClusterRole
An RBAC Role or ClusterRole contains rules that represent a set of permissions. Permissions are purely additive (there are no "deny" rules).
A Role always sets permissions within a particular namespace; when you create a Role, you have to specify the namespace it belongs in.
ClusterRole, by contrast, is a non-namespaced resource. The resources have different names (Role and ClusterRole) because a Kubernetes object always has to be either namespaced or not namespaced; it can't be both.
ClusterRoles have several uses. You can use a ClusterRole to:
- define permissions on namespaced resources and be granted within individual namespace(s)
- define permissions on namespaced resources and be granted across all namespaces
- define permissions on cluster-scoped resources
If you want to define a role within a namespace, use a Role; if you want to define a role cluster-wide, use a ClusterRole.
Role example
Here's an example Role in the "default" namespace that can be used to grant read access to pods:
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
namespace: default
name: pod-reader
rules:
- apiGroups: [""] # "" indicates the core API group
resources: ["pods"]
verbs: ["get", "watch", "list"]
ClusterRole example
A ClusterRole can be used to grant the same permissions as a Role. Because ClusterRoles are cluster-scoped, you can also use them to grant access to:
-
cluster-scoped resources (like nodes)
-
non-resource endpoints (like
/healthz
) -
namespaced resources (like Pods), across all namespaces
For example: you can use a ClusterRole to allow a particular user to run
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces
Here is an example of a ClusterRole that can be used to grant read access to secrets in any particular namespace, or across all namespaces (depending on how it is bound):
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
# "namespace" omitted since ClusterRoles are not namespaced
name: secret-reader
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
#
# at the HTTP level, the name of the resource for accessing Secret
# objects is "secrets"
resources: ["secrets"]
verbs: ["get", "watch", "list"]
The name of a Role or a ClusterRole object must be a valid path segment name.
RoleBinding and ClusterRoleBinding
A role binding grants the permissions defined in a role to a user or set of users. It holds a list of subjects (users, groups, or service accounts), and a reference to the role being granted. A RoleBinding grants permissions within a specific namespace whereas a ClusterRoleBinding grants that access cluster-wide.
A RoleBinding may reference any Role in the same namespace. Alternatively, a RoleBinding can reference a ClusterRole and bind that ClusterRole to the namespace of the RoleBinding. If you want to bind a ClusterRole to all the namespaces in your cluster, you use a ClusterRoleBinding.
The name of a RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding object must be a valid path segment name.
RoleBinding examples
Here is an example of a RoleBinding that grants the "pod-reader" Role to the user "jane" within the "default" namespace. This allows "jane" to read pods in the "default" namespace.
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
# This role binding allows "jane" to read pods in the "default" namespace.
# You need to already have a Role named "pod-reader" in that namespace.
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: read-pods
namespace: default
subjects:
# You can specify more than one "subject"
- kind: User
name: jane # "name" is case sensitive
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
roleRef:
# "roleRef" specifies the binding to a Role / ClusterRole
kind: Role #this must be Role or ClusterRole
name: pod-reader # this must match the name of the Role or ClusterRole you wish to bind to
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
A RoleBinding can also reference a ClusterRole to grant the permissions defined in that ClusterRole to resources inside the RoleBinding's namespace. This kind of reference lets you define a set of common roles across your cluster, then reuse them within multiple namespaces.
For instance, even though the following RoleBinding refers to a ClusterRole, "dave" (the subject, case sensitive) will only be able to read Secrets in the "development" namespace, because the RoleBinding's namespace (in its metadata) is "development".
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
# This role binding allows "dave" to read secrets in the "development" namespace.
# You need to already have a ClusterRole named "secret-reader".
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: read-secrets
#
# The namespace of the RoleBinding determines where the permissions are granted.
# This only grants permissions within the "development" namespace.
namespace: development
subjects:
- kind: User
name: dave # Name is case sensitive
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: secret-reader
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
ClusterRoleBinding example
To grant permissions across a whole cluster, you can use a ClusterRoleBinding. The following ClusterRoleBinding allows any user in the group "manager" to read secrets in any namespace.
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
# This cluster role binding allows anyone in the "manager" group to read secrets in any namespace.
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: read-secrets-global
subjects:
- kind: Group
name: manager # Name is case sensitive
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: secret-reader
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
After you create a binding, you cannot change the Role or ClusterRole that it refers to.
If you try to change a binding's roleRef
, you get a validation error. If you do want
to change the roleRef
for a binding, you need to remove the binding object and create
a replacement.
There are two reasons for this restriction:
- Making
roleRef
immutable allows granting someoneupdate
permission on an existing binding object, so that they can manage the list of subjects, without being able to change the role that is granted to those subjects. - A binding to a different role is a fundamentally different binding.
Requiring a binding to be deleted/recreated in order to change the
roleRef
ensures the full list of subjects in the binding is intended to be granted the new role (as opposed to enabling or accidentally modifying only the roleRef without verifying all of the existing subjects should be given the new role's permissions).
The kubectl auth reconcile
command-line utility creates or updates a manifest file containing RBAC objects,
and handles deleting and recreating binding objects if required to change the role they refer to.
See command usage and examples for more information.
Referring to resources
In the Kubernetes API, most resources are represented and accessed using a string representation of
their object name, such as pods
for a Pod. RBAC refers to resources using exactly the same
name that appears in the URL for the relevant API endpoint.
Some Kubernetes APIs involve a
subresource, such as the logs for a Pod. A request for a Pod's logs looks like:
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/log
In this case, pods
is the namespaced resource for Pod resources, and log
is a
subresource of pods
. To represent this in an RBAC role, use a slash (/
) to
delimit the resource and subresource. To allow a subject to read pods
and
also access the log
subresource for each of those Pods, you write:
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
namespace: default
name: pod-and-pod-logs-reader
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["pods", "pods/log"]
verbs: ["get", "list"]
You can also refer to resources by name for certain requests through the resourceNames
list.
When specified, requests can be restricted to individual instances of a resource.
Here is an example that restricts its subject to only get
or update
a
ConfigMap named my-configmap
:
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
namespace: default
name: configmap-updater
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
#
# at the HTTP level, the name of the resource for accessing ConfigMap
# objects is "configmaps"
resources: ["configmaps"]
resourceNames: ["my-configmap"]
verbs: ["update", "get"]
create
or deletecollection
requests by their resource name.
For create
, this limitation is because the name of the new object may not be known at authorization time.
If you restrict list
or watch
by resourceName, clients must include a metadata.name
field selector in their list
or watch
request that matches the specified resourceName in order to be authorized.
For example, kubectl get configmaps --field-selector=metadata.name=my-configmap
Aggregated ClusterRoles
You can aggregate several ClusterRoles into one combined ClusterRole.
A controller, running as part of the cluster control plane, watches for ClusterRole
objects with an aggregationRule
set. The aggregationRule
defines a label
selector that the controller
uses to match other ClusterRole objects that should be combined into the rules
field of this one.
Here is an example aggregated ClusterRole:
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: monitoring
aggregationRule:
clusterRoleSelectors:
- matchLabels:
rbac.example.com/aggregate-to-monitoring: "true"
rules: [] # The control plane automatically fills in the rules
If you create a new ClusterRole that matches the label selector of an existing aggregated ClusterRole,
that change triggers adding the new rules into the aggregated ClusterRole.
Here is an example that adds rules to the "monitoring" ClusterRole, by creating another
ClusterRole labeled rbac.example.com/aggregate-to-monitoring: true
.
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: monitoring-endpoints
labels:
rbac.example.com/aggregate-to-monitoring: "true"
# When you create the "monitoring-endpoints" ClusterRole,
# the rules below will be added to the "monitoring" ClusterRole.
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["services", "endpoints", "pods"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
The default user-facing roles use ClusterRole aggregation. This lets you, as a cluster administrator, include rules for custom resources, such as those served by CustomResourceDefinitions or aggregated API servers, to extend the default roles.
For example: the following ClusterRoles let the "admin" and "edit" default roles manage the custom resource
named CronTab, whereas the "view" role can perform only read actions on CronTab resources.
You can assume that CronTab objects are named "crontabs"
in URLs as seen by the API server.
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: aggregate-cron-tabs-edit
labels:
# Add these permissions to the "admin" and "edit" default roles.
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-admin: "true"
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-edit: "true"
rules:
- apiGroups: ["stable.example.com"]
resources: ["crontabs"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "create", "update", "patch", "delete"]
---
kind: ClusterRole
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: aggregate-cron-tabs-view
labels:
# Add these permissions to the "view" default role.
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-view: "true"
rules:
- apiGroups: ["stable.example.com"]
resources: ["crontabs"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
Role examples
The following examples are excerpts from Role or ClusterRole objects, showing only
the rules
section.
Allow reading "pods"
resources in the core
API Group:
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
#
# at the HTTP level, the name of the resource for accessing Pod
# objects is "pods"
resources: ["pods"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
Allow reading/writing Deployments (at the HTTP level: objects with "deployments"
in the resource part of their URL) in the "apps"
API groups:
rules:
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
#
# at the HTTP level, the name of the resource for accessing Deployment
# objects is "deployments"
resources: ["deployments"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "create", "update", "patch", "delete"]
Allow reading Pods in the core API group, as well as reading or writing Job
resources in the "batch"
API group:
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
#
# at the HTTP level, the name of the resource for accessing Pod
# objects is "pods"
resources: ["pods"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
- apiGroups: ["batch"]
#
# at the HTTP level, the name of the resource for accessing Job
# objects is "jobs"
resources: ["jobs"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "create", "update", "patch", "delete"]
Allow reading a ConfigMap named "my-config" (must be bound with a RoleBinding to limit to a single ConfigMap in a single namespace):
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
#
# at the HTTP level, the name of the resource for accessing ConfigMap
# objects is "configmaps"
resources: ["configmaps"]
resourceNames: ["my-config"]
verbs: ["get"]
Allow reading the resource "nodes"
in the core group (because a
Node is cluster-scoped, this must be in a ClusterRole bound with a
ClusterRoleBinding to be effective):
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
#
# at the HTTP level, the name of the resource for accessing Node
# objects is "nodes"
resources: ["nodes"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
Allow GET and POST requests to the non-resource endpoint /healthz
and
all subpaths (must be in a ClusterRole bound with a ClusterRoleBinding
to be effective):
rules:
- nonResourceURLs: ["/healthz", "/healthz/*"] # '*' in a nonResourceURL is a suffix glob match
verbs: ["get", "post"]
Referring to subjects
A RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding binds a role to subjects. Subjects can be groups, users or ServiceAccounts.
Kubernetes represents usernames as strings. These can be: plain names, such as "alice"; email-style names, like "bob@example.com"; or numeric user IDs represented as a string. It is up to you as a cluster administrator to configure the authentication modules so that authentication produces usernames in the format you want.
system:
is reserved for Kubernetes system use, so you should ensure
that you don't have users or groups with names that start with system:
by
accident.
Other than this special prefix, the RBAC authorization system does not require any format
for usernames.
In Kubernetes, Authenticator modules provide group information.
Groups, like users, are represented as strings, and that string has no format requirements,
other than that the prefix system:
is reserved.
ServiceAccounts have names prefixed
with system:serviceaccount:
, and belong to groups that have names prefixed with system:serviceaccounts:
.
system:serviceaccount:
(singular) is the prefix for service account usernames.system:serviceaccounts:
(plural) is the prefix for service account groups.
RoleBinding examples
The following examples are RoleBinding
excerpts that only
show the subjects
section.
For a user named alice@example.com
:
subjects:
- kind: User
name: "alice@example.com"
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
For a group named frontend-admins
:
subjects:
- kind: Group
name: "frontend-admins"
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
For the default service account in the "kube-system" namespace:
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: default
namespace: kube-system
For all service accounts in the "qa" namespace:
subjects:
- kind: Group
name: system:serviceaccounts:qa
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
For all service accounts in any namespace:
subjects:
- kind: Group
name: system:serviceaccounts
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
For all authenticated users:
subjects:
- kind: Group
name: system:authenticated
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
For all unauthenticated users:
subjects:
- kind: Group
name: system:unauthenticated
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
For all users:
subjects:
- kind: Group
name: system:authenticated
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
- kind: Group
name: system:unauthenticated
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
Default roles and role bindings
API servers create a set of default ClusterRole and ClusterRoleBinding objects.
Many of these are system:
prefixed, which indicates that the resource is directly
managed by the cluster control plane.
All of the default ClusterRoles and ClusterRoleBindings are labeled with kubernetes.io/bootstrapping=rbac-defaults
.
system:
prefix.
Modifications to these resources can result in non-functional clusters.
Auto-reconciliation
At each start-up, the API server updates default cluster roles with any missing permissions, and updates default cluster role bindings with any missing subjects. This allows the cluster to repair accidental modifications, and helps to keep roles and role bindings up-to-date as permissions and subjects change in new Kubernetes releases.
To opt out of this reconciliation, set the rbac.authorization.kubernetes.io/autoupdate
annotation on a default cluster role or rolebinding to false
.
Be aware that missing default permissions and subjects can result in non-functional clusters.
Auto-reconciliation is enabled by default if the RBAC authorizer is active.
API discovery roles
Default role bindings authorize unauthenticated and authenticated users to read API information that is deemed safe to be publicly accessible (including CustomResourceDefinitions). To disable anonymous unauthenticated access, add --anonymous-auth=false
to the API server configuration.
To view the configuration of these roles via kubectl
run:
kubectl get clusterroles system:discovery -o yaml
Default ClusterRole | Default ClusterRoleBinding | Description |
---|---|---|
system:basic-user | system:authenticated group | Allows a user read-only access to basic information about themselves. Prior to v1.14, this role was also bound to system:unauthenticated by default. |
system:discovery | system:authenticated group | Allows read-only access to API discovery endpoints needed to discover and negotiate an API level. Prior to v1.14, this role was also bound to system:unauthenticated by default. |
system:public-info-viewer | system:authenticated and system:unauthenticated groups | Allows read-only access to non-sensitive information about the cluster. Introduced in Kubernetes v1.14. |
User-facing roles
Some of the default ClusterRoles are not system:
prefixed. These are intended to be user-facing roles.
They include super-user roles (cluster-admin
), roles intended to be granted cluster-wide
using ClusterRoleBindings, and roles intended to be granted within particular
namespaces using RoleBindings (admin
, edit
, view
).
User-facing ClusterRoles use ClusterRole aggregation to allow admins to include
rules for custom resources on these ClusterRoles. To add rules to the admin
, edit
, or view
roles, create
a ClusterRole with one or more of the following labels:
metadata:
labels:
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-admin: "true"
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-edit: "true"
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-view: "true"
Default ClusterRole | Default ClusterRoleBinding | Description |
---|---|---|
cluster-admin | system:masters group | Allows super-user access to perform any action on any resource. When used in a ClusterRoleBinding, it gives full control over every resource in the cluster and in all namespaces. When used in a RoleBinding, it gives full control over every resource in the role binding's namespace, including the namespace itself. |
admin | None | Allows admin access, intended to be granted within a namespace using a RoleBinding.
If used in a RoleBinding, allows read/write access to most resources in a namespace, including the ability to create roles and role bindings within the namespace. This role does not allow write access to resource quota or to the namespace itself. This role also does not allow write access to Endpoints in clusters created using Kubernetes v1.22+. More information is available in the "Write Access for Endpoints" section. |
edit | None | Allows read/write access to most objects in a namespace.
This role does not allow viewing or modifying roles or role bindings. However, this role allows accessing Secrets and running Pods as any ServiceAccount in the namespace, so it can be used to gain the API access levels of any ServiceAccount in the namespace. This role also does not allow write access to Endpoints in clusters created using Kubernetes v1.22+. More information is available in the "Write Access for Endpoints" section. |
view | None | Allows read-only access to see most objects in a namespace.
It does not allow viewing roles or role bindings.
This role does not allow viewing Secrets, since reading the contents of Secrets enables access to ServiceAccount credentials in the namespace, which would allow API access as any ServiceAccount in the namespace (a form of privilege escalation). |
Core component roles
Default ClusterRole | Default ClusterRoleBinding | Description |
---|---|---|
system:kube-scheduler | system:kube-scheduler user | Allows access to the resources required by the scheduler component. |
system:volume-scheduler | system:kube-scheduler user | Allows access to the volume resources required by the kube-scheduler component. |
system:kube-controller-manager | system:kube-controller-manager user | Allows access to the resources required by the controller manager component. The permissions required by individual controllers are detailed in the controller roles. |
system:node | None | Allows access to resources required by the kubelet, including read access to all secrets, and write access to all pod status objects.
You should use the Node authorizer and NodeRestriction admission plugin instead of the system:node role, and allow granting API access to kubelets based on the Pods scheduled to run on them. The system:node role only exists for compatibility with Kubernetes clusters upgraded from versions prior to v1.8. |
system:node-proxier | system:kube-proxy user | Allows access to the resources required by the kube-proxy component. |
Other component roles
Default ClusterRole | Default ClusterRoleBinding | Description |
---|---|---|
system:auth-delegator | None | Allows delegated authentication and authorization checks. This is commonly used by add-on API servers for unified authentication and authorization. |
system:heapster | None | Role for the Heapster component (deprecated). |
system:kube-aggregator | None | Role for the kube-aggregator component. |
system:kube-dns | kube-dns service account in the kube-system namespace | Role for the kube-dns component. |
system:kubelet-api-admin | None | Allows full access to the kubelet API. |
system:node-bootstrapper | None | Allows access to the resources required to perform kubelet TLS bootstrapping. |
system:node-problem-detector | None | Role for the node-problem-detector component. |
system:persistent-volume-provisioner | None | Allows access to the resources required by most dynamic volume provisioners. |
system:monitoring | system:monitoring group | Allows read access to control-plane monitoring endpoints (i.e. kube-apiserver liveness and readiness endpoints (/healthz, /livez, /readyz), the individual health-check endpoints (/healthz/*, /livez/*, /readyz/*), and /metrics). Note that individual health check endpoints and the metric endpoint may expose sensitive information. |
Roles for built-in controllers
The Kubernetes controller manager runs
controllers that are built in to the Kubernetes
control plane.
When invoked with --use-service-account-credentials
, kube-controller-manager starts each controller
using a separate service account.
Corresponding roles exist for each built-in controller, prefixed with system:controller:
.
If the controller manager is not started with --use-service-account-credentials
, it runs all control loops
using its own credential, which must be granted all the relevant roles.
These roles include:
system:controller:attachdetach-controller
system:controller:certificate-controller
system:controller:clusterrole-aggregation-controller
system:controller:cronjob-controller
system:controller:daemon-set-controller
system:controller:deployment-controller
system:controller:disruption-controller
system:controller:endpoint-controller
system:controller:expand-controller
system:controller:generic-garbage-collector
system:controller:horizontal-pod-autoscaler
system:controller:job-controller
system:controller:namespace-controller
system:controller:node-controller
system:controller:persistent-volume-binder
system:controller:pod-garbage-collector
system:controller:pv-protection-controller
system:controller:pvc-protection-controller
system:controller:replicaset-controller
system:controller:replication-controller
system:controller:resourcequota-controller
system:controller:root-ca-cert-publisher
system:controller:route-controller
system:controller:service-account-controller
system:controller:service-controller
system:controller:statefulset-controller
system:controller:ttl-controller
Privilege escalation prevention and bootstrapping
The RBAC API prevents users from escalating privileges by editing roles or role bindings. Because this is enforced at the API level, it applies even when the RBAC authorizer is not in use.
Restrictions on role creation or update
You can only create/update a role if at least one of the following things is true:
- You already have all the permissions contained in the role, at the same scope as the object being modified (cluster-wide for a ClusterRole, within the same namespace or cluster-wide for a Role).
- You are granted explicit permission to perform the
escalate
verb on theroles
orclusterroles
resource in therbac.authorization.k8s.io
API group.
For example, if user-1
does not have the ability to list Secrets cluster-wide, they cannot create a ClusterRole
containing that permission. To allow a user to create/update roles:
- Grant them a role that allows them to create/update Role or ClusterRole objects, as desired.
- Grant them permission to include specific permissions in the roles they create/update:
- implicitly, by giving them those permissions (if they attempt to create or modify a Role or ClusterRole with permissions they themselves have not been granted, the API request will be forbidden)
- or explicitly allow specifying any permission in a
Role
orClusterRole
by giving them permission to perform theescalate
verb onroles
orclusterroles
resources in therbac.authorization.k8s.io
API group
Restrictions on role binding creation or update
You can only create/update a role binding if you already have all the permissions contained in the referenced role
(at the same scope as the role binding) or if you have been authorized to perform the bind
verb on the referenced role.
For example, if user-1
does not have the ability to list Secrets cluster-wide, they cannot create a ClusterRoleBinding
to a role that grants that permission. To allow a user to create/update role bindings:
- Grant them a role that allows them to create/update RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding objects, as desired.
- Grant them permissions needed to bind a particular role:
- implicitly, by giving them the permissions contained in the role.
- explicitly, by giving them permission to perform the
bind
verb on the particular Role (or ClusterRole).
For example, this ClusterRole and RoleBinding would allow user-1
to grant other users the admin
, edit
, and view
roles in the namespace user-1-namespace
:
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: role-grantor
rules:
- apiGroups: ["rbac.authorization.k8s.io"]
resources: ["rolebindings"]
verbs: ["create"]
- apiGroups: ["rbac.authorization.k8s.io"]
resources: ["clusterroles"]
verbs: ["bind"]
# omit resourceNames to allow binding any ClusterRole
resourceNames: ["admin","edit","view"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: role-grantor-binding
namespace: user-1-namespace
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: role-grantor
subjects:
- apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: User
name: user-1
When bootstrapping the first roles and role bindings, it is necessary for the initial user to grant permissions they do not yet have. To bootstrap initial roles and role bindings:
- Use a credential with the "system:masters" group, which is bound to the "cluster-admin" super-user role by the default bindings.
- If your API server runs with the insecure port enabled (
--insecure-port
), you can also make API calls via that port, which does not enforce authentication or authorization.
Command-line utilities
kubectl create role
Creates a Role object defining permissions within a single namespace. Examples:
-
Create a Role named "pod-reader" that allows users to perform
get
,watch
andlist
on pods:kubectl create role pod-reader --verb=get --verb=list --verb=watch --resource=pods
-
Create a Role named "pod-reader" with resourceNames specified:
kubectl create role pod-reader --verb=get --resource=pods --resource-name=readablepod --resource-name=anotherpod
-
Create a Role named "foo" with apiGroups specified:
kubectl create role foo --verb=get,list,watch --resource=replicasets.apps
-
Create a Role named "foo" with subresource permissions:
kubectl create role foo --verb=get,list,watch --resource=pods,pods/status
-
Create a Role named "my-component-lease-holder" with permissions to get/update a resource with a specific name:
kubectl create role my-component-lease-holder --verb=get,list,watch,update --resource=lease --resource-name=my-component
kubectl create clusterrole
Creates a ClusterRole. Examples:
-
Create a ClusterRole named "pod-reader" that allows user to perform
get
,watch
andlist
on pods:kubectl create clusterrole pod-reader --verb=get,list,watch --resource=pods
-
Create a ClusterRole named "pod-reader" with resourceNames specified:
kubectl create clusterrole pod-reader --verb=get --resource=pods --resource-name=readablepod --resource-name=anotherpod
-
Create a ClusterRole named "foo" with apiGroups specified:
kubectl create clusterrole foo --verb=get,list,watch --resource=replicasets.apps
-
Create a ClusterRole named "foo" with subresource permissions:
kubectl create clusterrole foo --verb=get,list,watch --resource=pods,pods/status
-
Create a ClusterRole named "foo" with nonResourceURL specified:
kubectl create clusterrole "foo" --verb=get --non-resource-url=/logs/*
-
Create a ClusterRole named "monitoring" with an aggregationRule specified:
kubectl create clusterrole monitoring --aggregation-rule="rbac.example.com/aggregate-to-monitoring=true"
kubectl create rolebinding
Grants a Role or ClusterRole within a specific namespace. Examples:
-
Within the namespace "acme", grant the permissions in the "admin" ClusterRole to a user named "bob":
kubectl create rolebinding bob-admin-binding --clusterrole=admin --user=bob --namespace=acme
-
Within the namespace "acme", grant the permissions in the "view" ClusterRole to the service account in the namespace "acme" named "myapp":
kubectl create rolebinding myapp-view-binding --clusterrole=view --serviceaccount=acme:myapp --namespace=acme
-
Within the namespace "acme", grant the permissions in the "view" ClusterRole to a service account in the namespace "myappnamespace" named "myapp":
kubectl create rolebinding myappnamespace-myapp-view-binding --clusterrole=view --serviceaccount=myappnamespace:myapp --namespace=acme
kubectl create clusterrolebinding
Grants a ClusterRole across the entire cluster (all namespaces). Examples:
-
Across the entire cluster, grant the permissions in the "cluster-admin" ClusterRole to a user named "root":
kubectl create clusterrolebinding root-cluster-admin-binding --clusterrole=cluster-admin --user=root
-
Across the entire cluster, grant the permissions in the "system:node-proxier" ClusterRole to a user named "system:kube-proxy":
kubectl create clusterrolebinding kube-proxy-binding --clusterrole=system:node-proxier --user=system:kube-proxy
-
Across the entire cluster, grant the permissions in the "view" ClusterRole to a service account named "myapp" in the namespace "acme":
kubectl create clusterrolebinding myapp-view-binding --clusterrole=view --serviceaccount=acme:myapp
kubectl auth reconcile
Creates or updates rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
API objects from a manifest file.
Missing objects are created, and the containing namespace is created for namespaced objects, if required.
Existing roles are updated to include the permissions in the input objects,
and remove extra permissions if --remove-extra-permissions
is specified.
Existing bindings are updated to include the subjects in the input objects,
and remove extra subjects if --remove-extra-subjects
is specified.
Examples:
-
Test applying a manifest file of RBAC objects, displaying changes that would be made:
kubectl auth reconcile -f my-rbac-rules.yaml --dry-run=client
-
Apply a manifest file of RBAC objects, preserving any extra permissions (in roles) and any extra subjects (in bindings):
kubectl auth reconcile -f my-rbac-rules.yaml
-
Apply a manifest file of RBAC objects, removing any extra permissions (in roles) and any extra subjects (in bindings):
kubectl auth reconcile -f my-rbac-rules.yaml --remove-extra-subjects --remove-extra-permissions
ServiceAccount permissions
Default RBAC policies grant scoped permissions to control-plane components, nodes,
and controllers, but grant no permissions to service accounts outside the kube-system
namespace
(beyond discovery permissions given to all authenticated users).
This allows you to grant particular roles to particular ServiceAccounts as needed. Fine-grained role bindings provide greater security, but require more effort to administrate. Broader grants can give unnecessary (and potentially escalating) API access to ServiceAccounts, but are easier to administrate.
In order from most secure to least secure, the approaches are:
-
Grant a role to an application-specific service account (best practice)
This requires the application to specify a
serviceAccountName
in its pod spec, and for the service account to be created (via the API, application manifest,kubectl create serviceaccount
, etc.).For example, grant read-only permission within "my-namespace" to the "my-sa" service account:
kubectl create rolebinding my-sa-view \ --clusterrole=view \ --serviceaccount=my-namespace:my-sa \ --namespace=my-namespace
-
Grant a role to the "default" service account in a namespace
If an application does not specify a
serviceAccountName
, it uses the "default" service account.Note: Permissions given to the "default" service account are available to any pod in the namespace that does not specify aserviceAccountName
.For example, grant read-only permission within "my-namespace" to the "default" service account:
kubectl create rolebinding default-view \ --clusterrole=view \ --serviceaccount=my-namespace:default \ --namespace=my-namespace
Many add-ons run as the "default" service account in the
kube-system
namespace. To allow those add-ons to run with super-user access, grant cluster-admin permissions to the "default" service account in thekube-system
namespace.Caution: Enabling this means thekube-system
namespace contains Secrets that grant super-user access to your cluster's API.kubectl create clusterrolebinding add-on-cluster-admin \ --clusterrole=cluster-admin \ --serviceaccount=kube-system:default
-
Grant a role to all service accounts in a namespace
If you want all applications in a namespace to have a role, no matter what service account they use, you can grant a role to the service account group for that namespace.
For example, grant read-only permission within "my-namespace" to all service accounts in that namespace:
kubectl create rolebinding serviceaccounts-view \ --clusterrole=view \ --group=system:serviceaccounts:my-namespace \ --namespace=my-namespace
-
Grant a limited role to all service accounts cluster-wide (discouraged)
If you don't want to manage permissions per-namespace, you can grant a cluster-wide role to all service accounts.
For example, grant read-only permission across all namespaces to all service accounts in the cluster:
kubectl create clusterrolebinding serviceaccounts-view \ --clusterrole=view \ --group=system:serviceaccounts
-
Grant super-user access to all service accounts cluster-wide (strongly discouraged)
If you don't care about partitioning permissions at all, you can grant super-user access to all service accounts.
Warning: This allows any application full access to your cluster, and also grants any user with read access to Secrets (or the ability to create any pod) full access to your cluster.kubectl create clusterrolebinding serviceaccounts-cluster-admin \ --clusterrole=cluster-admin \ --group=system:serviceaccounts
Write access for Endpoints
Kubernetes clusters created before Kubernetes v1.22 include write access to Endpoints in the aggregated "edit" and "admin" roles. As a mitigation for CVE-2021-25740, this access is not part of the aggregated roles in clusters that you create using Kubernetes v1.22 or later.
Existing clusters that have been upgraded to Kubernetes v1.22 will not be subject to this change. The CVE announcement includes guidance for restricting this access in existing clusters.
If you want new clusters to retain this level of access in the aggregated roles, you can create the following ClusterRole:
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
annotations:
kubernetes.io/description: |-
Add endpoints write permissions to the edit and admin roles. This was
removed by default in 1.22 because of CVE-2021-25740. See
https://issue.k8s.io/103675. This can allow writers to direct LoadBalancer
or Ingress implementations to expose backend IPs that would not otherwise
be accessible, and can circumvent network policies or security controls
intended to prevent/isolate access to those backends.
labels:
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-edit: "true"
name: custom:aggregate-to-edit:endpoints # you can change this if you wish
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["endpoints"]
verbs: ["create", "delete", "deletecollection", "patch", "update"]
Upgrading from ABAC
Clusters that originally ran older Kubernetes versions often used permissive ABAC policies, including granting full API access to all service accounts.
Default RBAC policies grant scoped permissions to control-plane components, nodes,
and controllers, but grant no permissions to service accounts outside the kube-system
namespace
(beyond discovery permissions given to all authenticated users).
While far more secure, this can be disruptive to existing workloads expecting to automatically receive API permissions. Here are two approaches for managing this transition:
Parallel authorizers
Run both the RBAC and ABAC authorizers, and specify a policy file that contains the legacy ABAC policy:
--authorization-mode=...,RBAC,ABAC --authorization-policy-file=mypolicy.json
To explain that first command line option in detail: if earlier authorizers, such as Node, deny a request, then the RBAC authorizer attempts to authorize the API request. If RBAC also denies that API request, the ABAC authorizer is then run. This means that any request allowed by either the RBAC or ABAC policies is allowed.
When the kube-apiserver is run with a log level of 5 or higher for the RBAC component
(--vmodule=rbac*=5
or --v=5
), you can see RBAC denials in the API server log
(prefixed with RBAC
).
You can use that information to determine which roles need to be granted to which users, groups, or service accounts.
Once you have granted roles to service accounts and workloads are running with no RBAC denial messages in the server logs, you can remove the ABAC authorizer.
Permissive RBAC permissions
You can replicate a permissive ABAC policy using RBAC role bindings.
The following policy allows ALL service accounts to act as cluster administrators. Any application running in a container receives service account credentials automatically, and could perform any action against the API, including viewing secrets and modifying permissions. This is not a recommended policy.
kubectl create clusterrolebinding permissive-binding \
--clusterrole=cluster-admin \
--user=admin \
--user=kubelet \
--group=system:serviceaccounts
After you have transitioned to use RBAC, you should adjust the access controls for your cluster to ensure that these meet your information security needs.